A young man proudly models his 9/11 commemorative shirt. The shirts are mass produced. Origin unkown.
Related posts:
|
||||||
|
Popular 9/11 Clothing Depicts Terror Attack On Twin Towers1 comment to Popular 9/11 Clothing Depicts Terror Attack On Twin TowersLeave a Reply |
|||||
|
Copyright © 2013 The Citizen's Report - All Rights Reserved |
||||||
Dear helvio, tnahks for your comment. As you can imagine, I’ve been angry up to the level of assassination once I saw the piece. You can check it up in my reply to a fast comment with the same link.At least, John Ellis replied so the BBC article was updated. He had to pay a lipservice to the climate hysteria, too, but at least, he explained why King’s opinions are rubbish even from a practical viewpoint.I don’t want to promote these words by King in a special text because I know that I would not be effective. This situation is just way too serious today. This shithead is a top science adviser in the U.K.This particular “cold war” between particle physics and climate hysteria started decades (or 15 years) ago when people close to Gore et al. helped to , originally politically designed by Reagan. They had similar anti-scientific, “practical”, activist sentiments.The only thing that was gradually changing since the early 1990s is that these intellectually inferior people were getting more self-confident, loud, and powerful as the standards in science and the media were plummeting. At some moment, it may be “too late” already and we will have to wait for a spectacular collapse of their system of “managing” science, analogous to the collapse of the Third Reich. It might be that the U.K. will have to be on a losing side of another world war about similar rather important matters.I don’t think it is meaningful at this moment to fight against these people by “their tools”, so to say, because the twats like King have contaminated all possible chairs that are actually deciding about the management of institutionalized science.Pure science is one of the key values of a true culture of our epoch, in the words of Feynman, and whoever disagrees should fuck off, using words of Dawkins (borrowed from New Scientist).
But even if an ordinary person really gives no damn about the fundamental truths about the Nature, having similar, pure, fundamental, ambitious dreams about learning the truth is what has historically motivated the creative minds in the best possible way.It’s no accident that the nuclear energy or the web were born in the physicists’ large facilities. The most spectacular future technologies to produce a lot of energy will come from particle physics, too.If someone switches these people to managing new kinds of biofuels or something like that, they won’t be “brilliant minds” but rather farmers and peasants which is something completely different (and much lower on the scale of brilliance).Best wishesLubos
[Translate]